Plunging Elevator Results in Lawsuit

 Negligence  Comments Off on Plunging Elevator Results in Lawsuit
Mar 052019
 

Getting in an elevator (lift) can feel like a daring, worrying experience. Those who don’t like being in confined and tight spaces will know exactly just how this can feel. However, when a lift that we get into does actually lead to a problem, it’s easy to see why people react with so much fear and shock. Lifts are supposed to make our lives easier – so when one fails, people often take action as form of compensation.

Indeed, this is now the case of a court action in Fort Worth, where a nurse in a Fort Worth hospital is suing the Thyssenkruppt Elevator Corp. after the elevator that she was using was plunged a series of floors, causing significant injuries, according to the lawsuit which was filed in Tarrant County district court.

The nurse, named as Rogena Wright, works at the Texas Health Methodist Hospital, and is an administrative supervisor at Harris-Alliance, also. On January 23rd, 2018, she was riding the lift at the Harris-Alliance when it fell down several stories, causing her to suffer injuries in the landing.

Also, the lawsuit alleges that there had been other incidents involving the elevator in the time prior to the incident with Wright. There were also recorded incidents after the event – though the lawsuit itself is sketchy on the details of other such incidents.

Two inspectors are named as part of the lawsuit, too, having been accused of failing to detect dangerous conditions within the elevator. According to the lawsuit, Thyssenkrupp failed in their duty to maintain their elevator to the correct standard.

The injuries suffered were extensive, including a herniated disk, injuries to the left ankle and lower back, bruising to the arms and issues including headaches, dizziness and tingling in the back, arms, feet and also head. The lawsuit claims that Wright has been unable to work due to the issues.

Suing Thyssenkrupp and the inspectors for a sum of $1 million, the firm’s spokesperson said simply that the firm will not comment on impending litigation.

 Posted by at 9:56 am

Kickapoo ‘mud pit’ Lawsuit Settled

 Negligence  Comments Off on Kickapoo ‘mud pit’ Lawsuit Settled
Feb 042019
 

In one of the odder lawsuits we’ve seen in the Springfield, Missouri area, the ‘mud put’ injury lawsuit has finally come to an end. This lawsuit involved Springfield Public Schools and Kickapoo High School. While the Springfield Public Schools group denies any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay a sum of $423,106 to settle a lawsuit filed by a former student of Kickapoo High School.

This lawsuit revolves around a 2011 incident, when the graduate was stomped into a muddy pit during a back-to-school program, leaving her with significant injuries. The student, Megan Taylor, at the time aged 17, suffered from significant damage whilst attending the “How Night,” a popular annual event at Kickapoo.

Taylor, now 25, was pushed from behind and fell into a muddy pit, face-first. According to one classmate, it was more akin to a “mosh pit” and was clearly dangerous. Taylor herself spoke about the incident at the 2017 deposition, saying: “I started screaming, telling them to get off because I was feeling really crushed. And I felt like everything was kind of just getting squished, “Then I felt my shoulder pop.”

Dragged away by a student who seen her fall unconscious during the incident, Taylor suffered significant injury due to the incident. The suit, brought against Springfield Public Schools and Lebanon Superintendent, David Schmitz – the principal of the school in 2010 – alleges that the muddy pit was nowhere near supervised enough, and that emergency aid was not delivered in a quick enough fashion.

While the district itself denies knowing any existence of the muddy pit event, the fact that sloganized t-shirts reading “There will be mud,” makes it hard to know what to expect.

The injuries suffered included a fractured collarbone as well as heart and chest tissue injuries. Indeed, the incident meant that Taylor suffered from four strokes, as well as permanent brain damage, severe dementia and even temporary total blindness that left her blind for a number of weeks.

Almost two months of missed term time was the result, and Taylor was also diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

While the full settlement details were not made clear in the settlement, Taylor had sought help with medical expenses and also an unspecified amount. When asked about the incident, Schmitz said: “I always wish every student the best, regardless of the circumstances, but I don’t want to comment beyond that.”

The Chief of Communications for the district, Stephen Hall, said: “The safety and well-being of our students will always be our first priority. We are committed to their best interests — always,” he said. “Any time one of our students is injured, our hearts go out to them, we seek opportunities to provide support, and we work to prevent future injuries from occurring. We are pleased that this case has been resolved and our very best wishes go with Megan as she moves forward.”

 Posted by at 10:13 am

Water Slide Builder Settles Injury Lawsuit for $2.75 Million

 Negligence  Comments Off on Water Slide Builder Settles Injury Lawsuit for $2.75 Million
Jan 092019
 

When we head to a water slide park, we expect to have a tremendously fun time. It’s fun to be able to have some fun, to relax and to just let ourselves go wild. The fun is all there in front of you, and the fact you’re mostly landing in water makes it all good fun. However, accidents do happen – and when they do happen, they can often be terrifying. For Anthony Dos Santos, a construction worker, it was the latter.

.

Twenty-three at the time, he was injured at the Dorney Park & Wildwater Kingdom in Allentown, Pa. – Dos Santos has now settled with the ride’s builder for around $2.75m. Unfortunately, the plaintiff had lost his leg during the incident.

.

The court documentation showed that the incident took place on April 23rd, 2014. Dos Santos was holding a tagline which is normally used to help control the suspended column, walking in front of and alongside the forklift. The forklift though, stopped suddenly and he was pulled directly over the wheel of the forklift due to the movement of the beam. It crushed his foot.

.

The lead plaintiff’s attorney from Stark & Stark, Tyler Tomlinson, said via a statement: “There was a much safer way to transport columns through the park, one that would not have presented hazards. Unfortunately, there also was not a supervisor on-site, as required by the contract, and the crew was understaffed.”  

.

Unfortunately, post-incident surgical work was not enough to save his foot, suffering from necrosis. His right leg was amputated below the knee, with the aim of a prosthetic fitting. Dos Santos, sadly, suffered from several infections – and also suffered from phantom limb pain. Adding on top of this the emotional toll of the incident, and Dos Santos was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder with depressed mood.

.

Married and with children, he was unable to work and, to this day, still suffers from chronic back pain and phantom limb pain. The secured fee would cover a fee for lost wages, pain and suffering as well as medical fees.


.

Whitewater West had a contract with Cedar Fair, which stated a supervisor was needed onsite. Cedar Fair was unaware, however, that a third party, KP Construction, was to take part in assisting the project. The owner of KP Construction, and second-in-command, were not present due to absence, and it meant a “skeleton crew” were moving the steel column on-site – a dangerous job.

.

However, the attorney for Dos Santos claimed that Whitewater was responsible as there was no supervisor at the Dorney Park construction site. Indeed, no Whitewater employee had been on-site for a considerable period of time prior to the injury. With claims that safer ways of moving the column were ignored, too, leading to the eventual resolution.

.

 Posted by at 4:43 pm

Deputies at Clear Creek County, CO Sued for Traumatic Brain Injuries

 Police Misconduct  Comments Off on Deputies at Clear Creek County, CO Sued for Traumatic Brain Injuries
Dec 012018
 

 

Being in prison often brings many risks, but we would never expect to be put at risk by the very officers in prison to protect us. However, a recent law suit brought against two officers of the law by Eric Magne, 37, shines a light on the potential incidents which could take place in the prison. Magne, 37, has brought suit against Deputy Michael Hansen and Georgetown Police Officer, Jon Geiger.

 

Brought to the U.S. District Court in Denver by attorneys Darold Killmer, Charles Crosse and Michael Lazar, the claims are quite extraordinary. Magne claims that his head was slammed against a cell-door head-first, causing a ‘traumatic brain injury’ according to the lawsuit.

 

At present, Magne is seeking unspecified compensation as well as punitive damages against Clear Creek County, CO as well as Geiger and Hansen. Geiger was sentenced to one year’s probation and also 60 days in jail on 10th July, pleading guilty to a misdemeanor count of harassment in a case that came from the jailing of Magne, per court records.

 

Magne himself was arrested on October 29th, 2016, in Georgetown. He was arrested for investigation into speeding and into drunken driving. He was fined on a reduced traffic charge for careless driving on July 18th, 2017. Magne asked to be placed in a cell for protection. However, after the cell door was shut three times, it continued to re-open.

 

The claim is that, rather than help Magne keep the door shut, Geiger allegedly ran into the cell, grabbed Magne by the wrist, pulled him out of the cell and pinned him against the metal cell door. According to the lawsuit: “Defendant Geiger’s infliction of excessive force against Mr. Magne caused significant pain, fright, discomfort and trauma to him, and was well in excess of the force necessary to accomplish any legitimate law enforcement objective,”

 

Magne also claims that he was taken to the booking area by Hansen, and Magne explained that he was unable to control his saliva after a previous injury. Saliva apparently fell on the sleeve of Hansen during the fingerprinting exercise, and Magne tried to clean the saliva off.

 

However, the lawsuit claims that Hansen then grabbed Magne via the back of the neck, and swung his head clean into a metal door frame. He collapsed to the floor, according to the lawsuit, and his head began to bleed profusely. Hansen then allegedly pinned his head to the floor, and the two officers are then supposed to have jumped on top of Magne, according to the lawsuit.

 

Magne required 17 staples to close the wound, and also suffered permanent injuries to his brain as well as developing a seizure disorder afterward.

 

 Posted by at 3:07 pm

What You Don’t Know about the Famous Scalding Coffee Lawsuit

 Consumer Law, Negligence  Comments Off on What You Don’t Know about the Famous Scalding Coffee Lawsuit
Nov 052018
 

McDonald's Coffee

 

As one of the most famous (or infamous) law suits, the scalding coffee lawsuit has become a folk tale in itself. An example of how to best manage the legal system to make it work in your favor. An easy way to hold power when, in reality, the situation is out of kilter with anything you would traditionally expect. Personal injury lawsuits bring about all manner of interesting stories, and this one was easily one of the most recognized and known lawsuits of the last thirty years or so.

 

It took place in 1992, when 79-year-old Stella Liebeck got a cup of coffee from McDonalds in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Having got the coffee to go, she was in the passenger seat of a parked car when she placed the cup of coffee between her legs to add in some milk and some sugar. However, the coffee tipped over onto her legs and left her with severe burns.

 

Third-degree burns were proven, and she needed skin grafts carried out on her inner thighs and other parts of the body. Having suffered the injuries, she hired a personal injury attorney and sued the fast food chain for her damages. In the end, she was awarded almost $3m in damages from the company.

Not the first time

However, while that might sound extreme for a one-off scenario, Liebeck was not the first person to be hurt in a similar fashion. Indeed, more than 700 reports previously existed of McDonalds-related coffee injuries: including some previous paid-out settlements to others.

 

Admitting to the fact that their coffee was too hot to be served, served at around 180-190 degrees Fahrenheit, they also admitted that they done nothing to change the risk posed by the coffee itself. Indeed, a Quality Assurance manager even attested that it was not safe for consumption via the mouth when first poured as it was simply too warm.

 

Offering to settle at $20,000 to cover medical expenses and lost income, Liebeck was shocked when McDonalds would, at most, offer her $800. McDonalds’ unwillingness to correct their coffee policy meant too many people were injured and that played a part in the eventual outcome, which was described by one juror as a “callous disregard for the safety of the people.”

 

So, when you see this claim that McDonalds got torn to shreds in court for “just one” spilt cup of coffee, think again. It usually would take a pretty significant amount of evidence to succeed with the claim made; that has now been proven to be the case. So, the next time you hear someone use this case as an example of a legal system gone mad, correct them and ensure they know this wasn’t just a once off!

 

 Posted by at 2:50 pm

Child Dies at Oregon Day Care Despite ‘Red Flag’ Warnings

 Child Abuse, Wrongful Death  Comments Off on Child Dies at Oregon Day Care Despite ‘Red Flag’ Warnings
Oct 032018
 

foster child care

 

When a child is placed into care at any kind of child or day care facility, high standards of care are obviously expected. The health and care of a child under the watchful eye of an expert should, for any parent, be something that provides comfort and certainty in equal measure. However, this certainty will be tested for parents with the recent news that a child died at an Oregon baby day care center, despite ‘red flag’ warnings that child welfare officials should have spotted, according to a lawsuit.

 

The lawsuit states that Oregon child welfare staff had overlooked allegations about one child suffering from traumatic injury at his day care center. It also states that a second baby boy died in the months following this incident. The parents of Allan Swearengin were never informed about the previous reports of abuse at Lane County Day Care, according to the lawsuit.

 

Indeed, ‘A.J.’ was supposed to have been found with repeated injuries at day care, before being found unconscious on September 12th, 2016. He was pronounced dead an hour and a half later, aged 10 months and six days.

 

The lawsuit, valued at around $18.75m, contends that the Department of Human Services, as well as his pediatrician, failed to protect A.J. and thus prevented him from death. The lawsuit also says that, had welfare workers investigated the role of the day care workers in the first traumatic incident, as the parents had urged, then this could have been prevented.

Worrying precedent

It was concluded that he died of non-accidental injuries, and that they were “highly similar” to the injuries suffered by the first baby. C.J. Greaves, one of four attorney’s involved in representing the boy’s estate, said: “Whatever else in terms of obligations, if DHS had done an investigation and spoken with the babysitter and actually looked at these files, A.J. would be alive today,

 

“It’s basic — just a warning that parents should be concerned, because how else is a parent going to know this?”

 

This comes in the face of multiple lawsuits coming up in Oregon against the child protection agency. It’s suggested that ‘grave failures’ have led to numerous deaths, or severe abuse, or children. Indeed, two young sisters were recently found to have been abused in foster care by a 13-year-old who had known issues.

 

The Department of Human Services spokeswoman, Christine Stone, said that the department does not comment on any pending cases. More on this story as it develops.  

 

 Posted by at 11:24 am

Furnishing Firm Faces Whistleblower Lawsuit

 Wrongful Termination  Comments Off on Furnishing Firm Faces Whistleblower Lawsuit
Sep 122018
 

 

Whistle Blower

Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo firm Celadon House look set to face a whistleblower lawsuit from a previous employee. Working as part of the home furnishing store in the past, the employee is taking Celadon House to court for wrongful termination and emotional distress. Represented by Anticouni & Associates, the claim is that the employer has forged a declaration and also forged the signature of the employee to beat back a Worker’s Compensation claim.

The employee, named Susanne Bjornson, worked at the retail store in the past. She alleges that she was in work the day that a fellow employee was hurt during moving some furniture. Having filed a claim against the company as part of her Worker’s Compensation package, Anticouni & Associates claim that the company did not hold Worker’s Compensation insurance, breaking Californian law in the process.

They also allege that Kelli Thornton and Cherisse Sweeney, the owners of the company, had prepared a Declaration in the name of Bjornson without her knowledge. Within the Declaration, it was claimed that the employee in question did not move injury, nor did they report the injury afterward. The lawsuit also makes the claim that one of the two owners then forged the signature of Bjornson on the document.

An ‘unlawful act’

Bjornson, for her part, claims that she was never interviewed by Cleadon House, and that the statements made in the Declaration are not true. In the claim, the argument is made that Bjornson is fearful of being caught up in an ‘unlawful act’ and thus chose to resign from the company immediately.

Bruce Anticouni, speaking on behalf of Bjornson, said: “When an employee is faced with working conditions so intolerable that reasonable person would have no other alternative except to resign, there has been a ‘constructive’ discharge of employment. The resignation is legally considered a termination of employment,

“The lawsuit alleges the Company forged Ms. Bjornson’s signature for an unlawful purpose. The two owners also violated the law by not having Workers’ Compensation insurance. Ms. Bjornson had no choice but to resign. Her forced termination was unlawful.”

 

 Posted by at 10:02 am

Bessemer City Sanitation Supervisor Sues Former Employer

 Wrongful Termination  Comments Off on Bessemer City Sanitation Supervisor Sues Former Employer
Aug 082018
 

Bessemer City Logo

 

In life, it’s rare to hear of people in the modern world who stay in the one job for many years. Today, people tend to change jobs on a regular basis as they try and find something short-term. When you give three decades to a job, though, you might expect that this will come with some kind of positive long-term benefit. Clarence Jackson had worked for the sanitation supervisory board in Bessemer City, North Carolina for over 30 years, but is now suing his former employers for wrongful termination.

Jackson was struck in the head by a piece of corrugated steel piping when he was supervising a team of prison inmates erecting a stop sign. This took place on August 6th, 2014, according to John H. Russell Jr., the attorney behind the lawsuit. Jackson then fell into a ditch and was left with a concussion, as well as a tear to his right rotator cuff and also injuries to his biceps tendon, his right knee and his spine.

Unable to work immediately after the incident had taken place, Jackson filed for workers’ compensation. However, on December 29th, 2015, he was fired. The city claims that Jackson had violated a dual employment policy, having worked with T & J’s Cleaning Service, an outdoor maintenance company that he owned, according to the lawsuit. The attorney for the City, David Smith, said that he does not typically comment on ongoing litigation cases.

The story so far

Jackson claims that, while he achieved ‘maximum improvement’ in both his shoulder and his knee, he still suffers from periodic back pains and post-concussive issues. This includes blurred vision, problems with his speech and headaches. Offered a “modified job” by James Inman, the City Manager, in September 2015, Jackson had to check with his neurologist and his attorney before acceptance could be provided.

He also disagrees that he was out cutting lawns for T & J’s, as alleged by Assistant City Manager Josh Ross. Jackson says that his injuries mean that manual labor was being delegated to other people. The lawsuit also claims that the city knew of his secondary employment, and that they had even hired his company in the past for pressure washing services.

Also, it’s alleged that local police forces were used to look into the situation, which is according to the lawsuit “an abuse of process and police power.”

According to the lawsuit, the city had “engaged its police force to interview outside witnesses and otherwise investigate the alleged violations of the personal conduct policy, policy against dual employment and/or allegations constitute the ‘problem’ asserted by Mr. Ross,”

More to come on this story as it develops.

 

 Posted by at 11:54 am

Brain Injury Lawsuit May Unravel NCAA Football

 Negligence  Comments Off on Brain Injury Lawsuit May Unravel NCAA Football
Jul 102018
 

For some time now, National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football has been in the middle of a massive lawsuit that, if it goes a certain way, will change sports for good. The brain injury lawsuit currently underway will hold incredible repercussions for the sport, and could lead to transformative changes at all levels of not just football, but all sports.

The case argues that NCAA ‘dropped the ball’ when dealing with the protection of the brains of a football player. This is the argument put across by the widow of a now-deceased player. The lawsuit is built around chronic traumatic encephalopathy, otherwise known as CTE. It’s a neurodegenerative illness, and has become a major talking point in sport very quickly.

NCAA Football Injury

 

The National Football League (NFL) settled for around $1bn with the families of players who had suffered brain damage. The College Athlete’s League also agreed to provide free bi-annual medical screening for all athletes. Now, the NCAA is set to take the matter to public court as they head to Texas civil court to fight their corner.

Starting on June 11th, the trial is a landmark case in that it’s the first time NCAA reps will be answering questions in a court with regards to brain injuries, their knowledge of CTE and whether information was concealed with regards to the potential for danger.

A landmark moment in sporting history

Debra Hardin-Ploetz, the plaintiff in the case, is the widow of Greg Ploetz. Ploetz was a linebacker and defensive tackle for the University of Texas, playing from 1968-1972. He died in 2015, and Boston University neurologists spent time looking at his brain. They found that he suffered from the ‘most severe’ form of CTE, and that this played a major role in what killed Ploetz.

Suffering from major symptoms including aggression and severe confusion, he eventually lost the ability to respond to questions outside of single answer response, and he needed full-time medical care.

Suing for $1m on the grounds of negligence in warning or protecting Ploetz and those like him about CTE, and also for wrongful death – a negligence claim made specifically about the case of Greg Ploetz.

While the NCAA argues that Ploetz was aware of the dangers of contact sport that they are not responsible, the argument is different. Indeed, there was no public policy during the time when Ploetz played: no rules existed either about what colleges had to tell players. While today such plans would be needed to help offer care for any concussed athlete, back then there was no such treatment plan in place.

They also must now sign a waiver, saying that they understand that this particular sport leaves them with the chance for severe head injuries. The addition of knee pads, shoulder pads, mouth guards and helmets are also mandatory now, as part of the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment procedure.

Naturally, this case will play a determining role in what happens in the future with many athletes previously impacted.

 

 Posted by at 1:53 pm

Man beaten so badly by cops that his eyeball fell out of its socket

 Police Misconduct  Comments Off on Man beaten so badly by cops that his eyeball fell out of its socket
Jun 132018
 

The discussion of police brutality has been raging for a few years now, with stories appearing on a semi-regular basis that really raises the importance of challenging this culture of violence. One story at the moment is the two-week federal trial taking place, beginning May 14th, against three deputies at the Hernando County Sherriff’s Office. They are accused of beating a Brooksville resident so badly that his eyeball came out of its socket, before trying to cover the beating up.

The event seemingly took place during a Christmas party in 2009, near the home of Michael Bratt and Marjorie Youman. Deputies responded to a complaint of noise at around 1:30AM, and the attending deputy, Steven George, is said to have jumped the fence of the home rather than use the call box at the gate.

Official reports state that Bratt was angry, and accused the deputy of trespassing. Youmans began to shout at the deputy before being taken back inside by Bratt, shoving her into the home. Accused by George of domestic battery, the two men engaged in a scuffle. George then claimed that Bratt slammed his head into a coffee table, and even tried to grab his taser.

Able to subdue Bratt and handcuff him on the floor, the story ends here. The story that Bratt and Youmans, tell, though, is very different. They say that Bratt put his arm out in a bid to restrain Youmans, before the deputy ‘screamed’ that battery was taking place, and tasered Bratt through the front door, falling face-first.

George then called for backup, before deputies Louis Genovese and Kenneth van Tassel arrived on the scene. Bratt was ‘dragged outside and ask if he liked beating up cops, or words to that effect.’

Bratt was supposedly beaten heavily by the cops, including a knee to the face by Genovese, who is over 300-pounds. It shattered the orbital bone, and caused his right eye to fall into the cheek cavity. Bratt’ step-father, an ex-military serviceman and a Vietnam veteran, said that he’d seen better treatment provided to prisoners of war, saying: “Being in Vietnam, being a Vet for a long time, we never treated our prisoners that way,” said Mike Sebesta. “We never did anything like that. I just hope justice… comes to them because I don’t think it’s right.”

Youmans was also charged with obstruction, though it was later dropped. Bratt was arrested for battery on a law enforcement officer. He was found not guilty in 2013 for the charge, and his attorney said that the police officer’ could not explain the damage to Bratt’ face, and that their stories were inconsistent.

Bratt and Youmans are seeking over $10m in damages. Van Tassel, one of the officers involved, has signed resigned and left the region. George is still an officer, and Genovese is now a sergeant.

 Posted by at 2:02 pm